Who are these "Hollywood-esque" rapists? *TW*

I've been mulling over a particular issue in regards to sexual violence, and I'm not 100% sure how to approach it, so any input would be appreciated.

This past year there have been a lot of conversations going on in the public sphere about taking the onus of rape prevention off of potential victims and holding rapists (or potential rapists) accountable. This is a great start, but one of the areas where there is still resistance is that a lot of people don't believe there's any point in telling rapists "don't rape" since they believe these rapists won't listen anyways.

So, let's talk about rapists. We know that most sexual violence is committed by someone known to the victim. We know that rape is about power and control, and not someone overwhelmed by sexual desire. We know that a large percentage of rapes are never reported, and because of the low reports rates and culture that places blame on the victim, most reports of rape do not end in jailtime or a conviction.

Part of the problem is our views of who the victims are - sluts, party girls, irresponsible ninnies who go jogging through dark alleys at 3am, college women who get "pressured" into sex, teenagers who hang with the wrong crowd, etc. There is definitely a tendency in our culture to set up hierarchies of who we think get raped more often and who we will blame for their assaults or disbelieve when they report.

What makes it easy to put this back on the victims is who our culture expects rapists to be - drooling, physically deformed, socially-awkward, dishevelled persons with mental health issues that hang out in the "bad" areas of town and in alleys in the middle of the night. They're also ocassionally accompanied by dramatic theme music and fog machines.

But who are rapists actually? People. Regular people. Intelligent people. Popular people. Family members. Community leaders. Attractive people who can easily find partners to have consensual sex with them. Charismatic people who make their friends and family feel valued and loved. Funny people who are a joy to be around. People who are wonderful enough that, when accused of a crime, will have supporters coming out of the woodwork to stand up for them and attest to their glowing characters.

And this is the problem. The problem is that so many people who commit crimes of sexual violence are otherwise really great people. It is uncomfortable to imagine that someone who does wonderful things for the community is actually responsible for committing grievous sexual violence against many at-risk young men and boys who have looked to him for guidance. It is uncomfortable to imagine that someone who has inspired people to want to better themselves and brought them closer to God could be responsible for committing sexual violence against his parishioners. It is uncomfortable to imagine that a teacher who has given her students confidence in their own intelligence and helped them improve their grades could have committed sexual violence against her students.

Let me make something very clear. It is far more uncomfortable to be one of those at-risk youth, parishioners, or students who were betrayed. It is far more uncomfortable to have one's body turned against them by someone they trusted. It is far more uncomfortable to get up the courage to disclose and have even more people they trusted betray them, this time by disbelieving, or blaming, or shaming, or shunning them.

As a culture, we need to reconcile our discomfort. We need to check ourselves before we disbelieve a report of sexual violence. Not because no one ever falsely reports, but because of the consequence of not giving someone the benefit of the doubt and reserving judgement. Next time it could be you who is assaulted and disbelieved. Next time it could be your partner, child, parent, etc. We owe it to each other to reconcile our discomfort and our cognitive dissonance to give people who disclose abuse the benefit of the doubt so that we can help dismantle this rape culture.

We can't do that by telling women to avoid dark alleys.


  1. I'm one of those who believes the rapist won't necessarily listen, but I don't think that lessens the need for us to take the focus off the victim's so called "responsibility" and place it on the perpetrator.

    By putting the responsibility where it lies, not only are we creating a culture that will be more supportive of the target of a sexual assault, but one that will be less supportive of the perpetrator. We also place responsibility on those who are complicit in sexual assault; everyone who knows a rape apologist and allows a callous comment here and there, everyone who can see misogyny brewing in a rejected boyfriend, or misopaedia disguised as humour is now in a better position to speak up. By making it easier to recognize the abuse of authority, we create a society that supports those who are abused and can put safeguards in place when deciding where to place our trust.

    And by using accountable language, we make it easier to effectively deal with offenders not only criminally, but socially as well.

    And the dark alley/never be alone/don't talk to strangers BS has to end. It's important we ALL understand intent creates access, but access does NOT create intent!

    I think you're bang on, Damsel. Trust your gut!

    1. I agree.

      I don't think placing responsibility on the rapist is going to make every potential rapist decide not to rape.

      I do, however, think that creating a system and a society that's categorically intolerant of rape -- both in what we say and what we do -- may make some potential rapists rethink their choices. And I'm 100% for that as marked improvement.


Post a Comment